Although many on the left want to deny its validity, IQ has stubbornly retained its usefulness as a predictor of achievement-- particularly academic achievement. The 'nature/nurture' question of whether heritable or environmental factors dominate remains open, but few doubt that both factors are significantly at play. The latest research seems to indicate that heritability sets a 'floor' for IQ but that environmental factors can add as much as 15-20 points to adult IQ-- which is quite a lot.
First-world societies are, it seems to me, relatively high-IQ societies. As a society, therefore, we should aim to increase average IQ over time through both its heritable and environmental factors.
How can the US can retain (regain?) its status as a first-world country, rather than continue what I see as its Third World Drift? Readers of my other blogs may be surprised by some of the opinions expressed here. Although I generally consider myself on the progressive left-- particularly on environmental issues-- on issues of crime and law and order I stand somewhere to the right of Benito Mussolini. I'm in favor of civilization. You'd be surprised how many people aren't.
Featured Post
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Thursday, June 13, 2013
immigration
Immigration reform needs to concentrate on bringing in high-skills people who will benefit the overall economy. The low-skills illegals who would benefit most from current proposals should not be the focus of reform. The problem with this latter group is not themselves, but rather their children: 1. There are too many of them, likely to be a drain on government services and benefits. 2. They don't do well in school, which means they'll just produce another generation of low-skills people-- or more welfare recipients and criminals.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)