Featured Post

Monday, August 29, 2016

trump, hillary, immigration

I have no intention of voting for Donald Trump, but on immigration my views are certainly closer to his than to Hillary Clinton's.

Our immigration policy should be based on enhancing our national interest. There are hundreds of millions of people on this planet who would love to live in this country. We can afford to be very choosy about who we let into this country, and we should be. We need a high-skills, high-education citizenry if we're to remain globally competitive and preserve a functioning democracy, rule of law, and all those other things we like. Anybody who would suggest that bringing in 12-15 million illiterate peasants from Mexico and Central America would somehow enhance our national interest would be looked at as if he had a hole in his head.

In a way, I'm less concerned about the illegals themselves than their children.  Hispanics have the highest dropout rate of any group in the population, and even those who do stay in school don't do particularly well. The last thing we need in this country is a second underclass. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: If we had 12-15 million illegal Chinese immigrants in this country, but their kids were getting straight A's and winning science scholarships, nobody would care.

Hillary, on the other hand, at least in her public remarks, seems to make no distinction whatever between legal and illegal immigrants.  She just refers to them all as 'immigrants.' What are we to make of this? Of  course, no journalist ever asks her that rude question. Does this mean that as President she would have no intention of enforcing our immigration laws at all? Just take on all comers? Our crack media investigators really need to pin her down on this. But don't hold your breath.


Friday, August 5, 2016

affirmative action

This morning on the NPR 'Marketplace Tech' show, one of the guests was a woman who was head of the Iowa Black Business Coalition. She was bemoaning the fact that 'only' 9% of Apple's employees were African-American. Actually, this is a much higher percentage than at Facebook or Google and is the result of Apple's new affirmative action program.

Affirmative action is a form of handout, and it's even more pernicious than other handouts in that it's a zero-sum game. For every less-qualified black or Hispanic who's hired, a more-qualified white or Asian is shut out. That's wrong, and of course it will redound to the detriment of the company in fairly short order. You keep hiring less-qualified people over more-qualified people, and pretty soon you end up with an uncompetitive company. And we know what happens to them.